The Tudors: the Psyche of a 16th Century Monarch
The Tudors is a show that can
very easily illustrate what is wrong with modern TV. It's sexing up of the life
of King Henry VIII is seen in one of two ways. The first, why should the show
even exist? It's historical inaccuracies are numerous and its portrayal of sex and love is ridiculous. The
second, the show brings history to life in interesting and thought-provoking
ways. And if the sex is what brings people in, the history is what will keep them.
I fall in line more with the
second viewpoint. That isn't to say that the show's portrayal of sex is indeed juvenile and mostly unneeded. The show's
creator Michael Hirst has even suggested as much. The sex is a way to bring in
viewers, it is a sad but true fact that sex sells. That does not mean that
Hirst does not use it to explore every possible inch of Henry VIII psyche.
That is where the Tudors shines.
In some ways the show could care less about life in the 16th century. The shows real passion is its
exploration of what it means to be a monarch in the 16th century and how that
would affect your mind. Think about it, if you are told from the day you were
born that you are God's right-hand on earth your perception would be just a
little skewed and self-centered. The show in essence lives inside a monarchs head,
therefore every thought is driven by and extreme sense of ego and passion.
As a consequence it doesn't
really matter that the show has historical inaccuracies because it is all seen through the eyes of a narcissist. Now
that does not mean that the show does not focus on history. To the contrary the
show's core is history and it remains that until the end. Though as with most dramatic
historical endeavors the first and foremost goal is to be entertaining which
ultimately allows shows like the Tudors to explore history in a more vibrant
way.
Henry VIII isn't just a name in history
or painting on a wall, he was and he is a real person. Brought to life with skill
and passion by Jonathan Rhys Myers. Without Meyers at its core I believe the Tudors
would have fallen apart. The show works because it gives voice to history and Meyers
gives that voice it's mind. Every decision and every fault is believable
because Meyers and by extension Henry believes it to the core of their being. Very
few actors are able to reach that level of connection with their characters. Meyers
is able to do that and more, bringing understanding and depth to a person that
most think was a tyrant.
The Tudors excels at gaining
sympathy for its characters that's why the show works so well, because if one
can sympathize then they can understand why a person would do what they do. Their
actions may ultimately be despicable, however at that point the gap between
history and the present has already been breached and the show has done its
job.
Great show. We watched the whole series. Some very good acting.
ReplyDelete