Cheer for the Victor: Rethinking Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
There is one sentiment that seems to hold true among my friends and I
regarding the fourth film in the Harry Potter series. That is that Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is not
a great film. With its apparent overacting and disregard for one of the most
entertaining sequences in the novel the film has left us cold and unsatisfied at every re-watching. Thus was my thought as I
settled in to watch all the Harry Potter films this Saturday
Yet something
intriguing happened, as I watched Dumbledore speak to the students of Hogwarts
about eternal glory and the challenges that lie ahead in the Tri-Wizard
tournament. I understood. I understood why the acting was punched up to 11, and
why everyone seemed to be yelling at no one in particular. And I understood why
everyone looked like beefed up rugby players. This is not a Harry Potter film I
thought, this is the greatest rugby
match ever played.
The whole film is
the Tri-Wizard tournament, from its opening ceremonies to Harry's final
confrontation with Voldemort. The film mirrors, the very best sporting events. It has
an opening ceremony, an introduction of competitors and a first and second
half.
For fans of the
novel one of the most glaring omissions is that of the Quidditch World Cup. The
filmmakers seem to taunt the audience when they allow them to see the opening
ceremony of the Wizarding world's biggest sporting event but nothing else. Why
is this? When Cornelius Fudge booms "And let the games begin". He Is
in a sense not opening the Quidditch
World Cup, he is in fact opening the Tri-Wizard tournament.
Director Mike
Newell, and screenwriter Steve Kloves uses this particular structure to great
effect. everything is heightened in this realm of competition and excitement.
It is almost as if the audience is in the stadium with the characters cheering
for those they want to win and booing for those they want to lose. The noise
level, the more exaggerated acting in this case is meant to get the audience
riled up or excited for the events to come. So it makes perfect sense for
Dumbledore to speak of eternal glory,
and winners and losers. Because that is what the film is about, competition and
the calm before the storm. Though does
it stand up to what came before? Does it fit alongside Alfonso Cuaron's more intimate Harry Potter and the Prisoner
of Azkaban. The answer, yes.
What Steve Kloves is
trying to say with Goblet of Fire is that we gave you a taste of what is to
come with Prisoner of Azkaban now just sit back and relax , because everything
after this point is the proverbial shit
hitting the fan. Now does this mean Kloves and Newell do not allow us to
anticipate what is to come? Far from it. In fact the film is filled with hints such
as, Dumbledore's trust of Snape getting
stronger and allusions to horcruxs with many other hints besides. There is no
shortage of Steve Kloves having fun with the audience showing off his
foreknowledge as he skillfully places the pieces on the board for the events to
come.
Though Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire has
some disappointing omissions with its adaption from book to screen. It does
maintain the spirit of the novel without sacrificing anything of note. Meaning
it retains what it needs to retain and loses what it needs to lose with a clear
understanding of why it is doing so. As a result the film ultimately does what it
is supposed to do which is honor its source material as well as craft an
entertaining ride for its film audience.
Comments
Post a Comment